Notice
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Link
| 일 | 월 | 화 | 수 | 목 | 금 | 토 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
Tags
- 칭찬교육
- pid
- 쇼펜의상속자 #킨텍스메가쇼 #섬유향수탈취제
- windows
- rm -rf
- ext3
- cadre
- goaccess
- Linux
- Kernel
- Python
- rm
- http
- CPU
- 디스크
- ext4
- Performance
- 좌절교육
- DNS
- Cache
- iptables
- 리눅스
- PORT
- Hack
- apachetop
- PERL
- Bash
- Disk
- 솔라리스
- rsync
Archives
- Today
- Total
목록language (1)
Ben's
performance of different scripting languages: shell v. perl v. python v. ruby
http://opennomad.com/content/performance-different-scripting-languages-shell-v-perl-v-python-v-ruby Results To be honest, I was surprised at the results. I ran the tests 3 times and took averages. The data can be viewed at Google Docs Performance of Scripting Languages with the raw results in their owns sheets. Here is the summary table, but the google doc looks crisper. . Shell Perl Python Ruby..
리눅스/python
2013. 1. 22. 15:13